<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Electronic Cigarette Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.puffweb.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.puffweb.com</link>
	<description>Read our Expert Picks AND Real User Reviews!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 23:28:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>V2 Cigs</title>
		<link>http://www.puffweb.com/v2-cigs-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puffweb.com/v2-cigs-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 01:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Cigarette Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puffweb.com/?p=475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember that song &#8220;Simply the Best&#8221;? Well after 2 years of using E-cigs, I have to say V2 is &#8220;better than all the rest&#8221;.
I was a long time user of Green Smoke, but when I got a call from the &#8230; <a href="http://www.puffweb.com/v2-cigs-review/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puffweb.com/v2-cigs-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green Smoke</title>
		<link>http://www.puffweb.com/greensmoke-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puffweb.com/greensmoke-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Cigarette Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puffweb.com/?p=397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greensmoke is a really good Electronic Cigarette, and for a long time they were the top brand. They are still great, and I like to put them at my #2 choice.
Green Smoke uses disposable cartridges and their batteries have improved &#8230; <a href="http://www.puffweb.com/greensmoke-review/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puffweb.com/greensmoke-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BullSmoke</title>
		<link>http://www.puffweb.com/bullsmoke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puffweb.com/bullsmoke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Cigarette Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puffweb.com/?p=1214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bullsmoke is a brand of electronic cigarettes that, from what I can tell, markets to heavier smokers. Meaning, their E-cigs are supposed to be stronger and more “rough and tough” like a real full flavor cigarette.
For those that smoke Camel &#8230; <a href="http://www.puffweb.com/bullsmoke/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puffweb.com/bullsmoke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One80 Cigs</title>
		<link>http://www.puffweb.com/one80-cigs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puffweb.com/one80-cigs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Cigarette Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puffweb.com/?p=1209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One80 E-cigs is a real smooth tasting Electronic Cigarette. I wouldn’t recommend it for those that like the harsher type flavors. They actually sell these in retail locations and have recently started selling online.
Now, normally I always say that the &#8230; <a href="http://www.puffweb.com/one80-cigs/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puffweb.com/one80-cigs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smoke Tip</title>
		<link>http://www.puffweb.com/smoke-tip-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puffweb.com/smoke-tip-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Cigarette Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puffweb.com/?p=1173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smoke Tip was a brand that I was not familiar with until I was contacted by them asking for my review. We did this review fresh out of the box, live on camera.
Smoke Tip has a pretty good taste to it, with &#8230; <a href="http://www.puffweb.com/smoke-tip-review/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puffweb.com/smoke-tip-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Beach Smoke</title>
		<link>http://www.puffweb.com/south-beach-smoke-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puffweb.com/south-beach-smoke-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 21:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Cigarette Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puffweb.com/?p=1078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[South Beach Smoke has been after me for awhile to do a review of their Electronic Cigarette. I try to only include the really &#8220;good&#8221; brands on my video reviews, and leave the not so good ones by the wayside &#8230; <a href="http://www.puffweb.com/south-beach-smoke-review/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puffweb.com/south-beach-smoke-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Luci E-cig</title>
		<link>http://www.puffweb.com/luci-electronic-cigarette-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puffweb.com/luci-electronic-cigarette-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 02:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Cigarette Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puffweb.com/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LUCI Electronic Cigarettes have three components, unlike most modern E-cigs that have two. This can be discouraging for some people because its more parts to deal with.
Luci is about average as far as E-cigs go, and I don&#8217;t really see &#8230; <a href="http://www.puffweb.com/luci-electronic-cigarette-review/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puffweb.com/luci-electronic-cigarette-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blu Cigs</title>
		<link>http://www.puffweb.com/blu-cigs-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puffweb.com/blu-cigs-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Cigarette Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puffweb.com/?p=319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After trying Blu Cigs for the first time, I noticed the cartridges produce alot of vapor. Some E-cigs have a problem producing enough vapor to make you feel like you are really smoking. But these cartridges have alot of flavor &#8230; <a href="http://www.puffweb.com/blu-cigs-review/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puffweb.com/blu-cigs-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Premium E-Cig</title>
		<link>http://www.puffweb.com/premium-e-cig-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puffweb.com/premium-e-cig-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Cigarette Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puffweb.com/?p=394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I tried Premium Electronic Cigarettes, I was prepared to write a very positive review, even though they are pricey. However, I was going on vacation for 2 weeks and just figured I could do it once I got back. &#8230; <a href="http://www.puffweb.com/premium-e-cig-review/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puffweb.com/premium-e-cig-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Safe Cig</title>
		<link>http://www.puffweb.com/the-safe-cig-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.puffweb.com/the-safe-cig-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Cigarette Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.puffweb.com/?p=391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Safe Cig is an ok E-cig. I won&#8217;t deny that. But honeslty, I think they are a bit overpriced. Their customer service is garbage. With other Ecig companies like V2 out there, I don&#8217;t see how these guys do well at all. Once &#8230; <a href="http://www.puffweb.com/the-safe-cig-review/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.puffweb.com/the-safe-cig-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

